Jersey City $4.6 Billion Casino Resort Proposed for North Jersey

A casino in Jersey City could fight down competition from ny in the Garden State casino market (Image: sloanspringer.com)

Venture capitalist Paul Fireman wants to construct a $4.6 billion casino resort in Jersey City, according to reports by the newest Jersey press. State Governor Chris Christie recently declared his openness to your expansion of casino gaming into North Jersey, and it appears Fireman, who is a former ceo of reebok now operates Fireman Capital Partners, is working hard to make it play lightning link slot online work well.

The businessman has been ending up in brand New Jersey politicians over the month that is past discuss his proposition for a 95-story hotel and casino rising above New York Harbor that will also feature a motorsports stadium and ‘the largest Ferris wheel into the world.’

Atlantic City, which includes always had the monopoly on casino gaming since the property that is first there in 1978, has lately been in serious economic straits. Despite injections of cash and a plan that is five-year rejuvenate the city, spearheaded by Governor Christie in 2011, its casino market did not bounce back through the recession, because was hoped.

Also, it is often hit hard by brand new competition from neighboring states such as for instance Pennsylvania, which has superseded New Jersey as the second casino market that is biggest in the usa, after Nevada. Even though Atlantic City casinos like The Showboat and Revel contemplate closure, Christie has evidently been forced to concede that the tactic that is new needed.

Very good News for AC?

But not even close to hurting Atlantic City, many analysts genuinely believe that an expansion in the north will help the resort that is ailing. The proposed resort in Jersey would stay right across the harbor from Manhattan, and would work as a bastion, protecting brand New Jersey from further competition from the new casinos planned for upstate New York, diverting New Yorkers and vacationers away from those gambling enterprises, while gathering income that may help develop Atlantic City.

State Senate President Stephen Sweeney agrees.

‘This conversation is going to be had because it has to be had, but it won’t be had at Atlantic City’s expense,’ he said. ‘If anybody thinks that we’m perhaps not dedicated to Atlantic City, they’re crazy. We cannot ignore that competition will be in ny shortly. However, if nj-new Jersey reacts by starting a casino in North Jersey, it should take place in a way that may benefit Atlantic City truly. Now we tax casinos at eight-and-a-half percent. Maybe we set a new tax rate for a casino in the north and a percentage of that that’s significant enough to simply help Atlantic City comes to Atlantic City.’

‘It Will Blow Away Macau’

While casino expansion into North Jersey would require an amendment to your state constitution, Sweeney stated recently which he had been willing to enable citizens to vote on such an amendment year that is next. And while information on the proposed development in Jersey City stay few and far between, it appears that Fireman has convinced some people in high places already.

Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop indicated his excitement this week about a ‘world-class facility that includes a casino, hotel and meeting center along with the biggest Ferris wheel on the planet all found next to the park that is best in New Jersey (Liberty State Park).’ He added that the project would ‘create 25,000 jobs’ and attract ‘over $5 billion of investment.’

‘It’s huge,’ said state Senator Raymond Lesniak, who’s met with Fireman. ‘It has the factor that is wow; it’s going to blow away Macau as a destination place for gaming.’

Casinos Seek Conscious Uncoupling from US Dog Racing

Greyhound dog racing is now merely a sideshow at many US tracks, where casino games bring in the profits that are real. The sport has also been the topic of intense criticism. (Image: derrydaily.net)

In the event that you shop around the USA, you’ll still see an amount that is fair of race, at least in those states that have not made the practice illegal, following massive criticism of several of the problems surrounding the sport. But at most songs, greyhounds are actually raced simply to fulfill a legal responsibility that allows the owners to also stage more profitable tasks. Of course the time comes when that inspiration to stage dog races goes away, there could be no reason left to own them at all: one thing that many people would say is a thing that is good.

The signs of dog race’s demise are seen by industry experts for decades. In 1990, there was nearly $1 billion bet on live dog races in Florida, one of many remaining hotbeds for the competitions. In 2013, that true number had dropped to $258 million. The decline was mainly caused by the spread of casino gambling over the nation, which gave gamblers and tourists more choices for spending their some time cash.

Dog Racing Just a Way to Casino Revenues

Yet those exact same casinos have likely saved greyhound racing at the same time. Many tracks are subsidized by the same casinos that have taken their business away, making it profitable to keep the events going, even as interest in them has waned.

The track owners actually run casinos, slot parlors, or poker rooms themselves in many cases. In these situations, it’s almost always the other business that is lucrative; the races are needed as element of licenses that need ‘coupling’ the casino-style games with races.

That’s the case in Florida, that is still home to 12 of the 21 American tracks offering live greyhound racing. A great many other tracks do not even have their own races anymore, and keep up the racing part of the bargain only by simulcasting contests off their tracks.

Owners, Opponents Want Decoupling

This has left numerous racetrack owners to push for a ‘decoupling’ motion that would end their obligation to operate dog races and just let them focus on their other gambling interests. This has triggered a uncommon alliance between track owners and animal rights groups who believe that the events are cruel and that the dogs are mistreated. These groups genuinely believe that decoupling will inevitably induce the end (however slowly) of greyhound racing in the United States.

In Florida’s most recent make an effort to restructure the state’s gaming laws, one proposal to decouple casino gambling from greyhound racing was rejected, though it might come back the following year. Similarly, West Virginia killed a bill that would have cut the licensing fees and paid down the minimum quantity of race days required at certainly one of their state’s two dog racing tracks.

With both owners and opponents up to speed for decoupling, you may be wondering who is against the change. One response is the horse industry that is racing which believes this type of movement could sooner or later kill their sport aswell.

Horse racing is just a a great deal more popular and financially viable sport than greyhound race. However, only the largest tracks are truly lucrative, and many now operate ‘racinos’ with slot machines as well as other games in order to show a profit. If horse racing are not required, some of these tracks could switch up to pure casino operations, shrinking the industry.

Greyhound racing is presently illegal in 39 states, while four others have no songs, despite the lack of legislation prohibiting them. Each host one or two dog racing tracks along with Florida, which has a dozen venues, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Iowa, Texas and West Virginia.

As Portuguese Economy Tumbles, RGA Chides Online Tax Hikes

The Remote Gambling Association has reacted to new Portuguese online sports betting operator taxes, even as Portugual continues to face overall economy. (Image: bullionstreet.com)

Even as Portuguese banking shares tumbled this week, sending fear throughout the EU bank system, the Remote Gambling Association (RGA), the largest Internet gaming trade association in the world, has slammed Portugal’s draft gambling bill, branding its tax prices as ‘unworkable’ and urged regulators to consider once again. The punitive 8 to 16 percent tax on sports betting stakes would make the market ‘unviable’ for online operators, it claims.

The bill is currently winging its method through the Portuguese parliamentary system, with the government anxious to regulate at the earliest opportunity as section of a wide-ranging recovery plan that is economic. Portugal once was bailed out of a economic crisis in 2011 by the EU Commission, the European Central Bank and Global Monetary Fund in a €78 billion ($106.14 billion) rescue system. It exited the program in might and now faces pressure that is increasing bolster its still-embattled economy.

Secretary of State Adolfo Mesquita Nunes announced recently that taxation revenues from the online that is new gambling will be split between central and regional governments and used to ‘encourage sport as well as for cultural development.’ In addition to the tax on stakes, gross revenue on recreations betting will be taxed at around 37.5 per cent, while ‘games of chance,’ which include casino gaming, and, apparently, poker, will be somewhere between the 15 to 30 percent mark.

‘To the Detriment of Customers and State’

The RGA claims that current taxation levels will limit competition into the market ‘to the detriment of Portuguese consumers therefore the tax revenues that the Portuguese state could take had been industry to be taxed at a sensible rate of gross gaming revenue.’ In addition criticized the very fact that the Portuguese monopoly operator of offline sports betting, Santa Casa, will likely be only taxed at half the rate of its counterparts that are online.

Clive Hawkswood, chief executive officer of the RGA, said: ‘Whilst the RGA as well as its people welcome the Portuguese initiative in seeking to control the web gambling sector, our members are extremely concerned about the unworkable tax rates that are proposed in the draft legislation which is presently being considered.

‘The extent for the disparity in tax burden between licensed online sports betting operators while the offline monopoly operator Santa Casa could possibly be as much as 50 per cent and only Santa Casa. This kind of differential has the potential to create a situation of substantial illegal state help being issued to Santa Casa by the Portuguese government whilst also destroying any hope for fair competition in a future regulated online sports wagering government.’

Constructive Dialogue Needed

The current draft gambling bill recommends a jurisdiction similar to those that exist in countries like France and Italy while some lawmakers in Portugal wanted to see the introduction of an open market. International operators is going to be able make an application for licenses providing they ‘meet the requirements,’ and ‘are in good financial standing in their funds and social security.’ Nonetheless, organizations will additionally have to be ‘established and registered’ within the nation and certainly will have to give you their services through a bot.PT domain name.

Mesquita Nunes refused become drawn recently on any projections of annual revenue for the new market, saying it’s impossible to understand how numerous operators would apply for Portuguese licenses. The reply to that would be ‘not many. with the present proposed taxation figures, argues the RGA’

The RGA says it would welcome the chance to engage in a ‘constructive dialogue because of the Portuguese government to ensure a level playing field for many online sports betting operators seeking to obtain licenses.’