Massachusetts Gaming Commission Allows for Delayed Revere Vote

A 3-D rendering associated with the proposed Suffolk Downs casino, now planned for Revere with partner Mohegan Sun (Image: Wendy Maeda/Boston Globe)

They say the household always wins, and right now, prospective casino operators Suffolk Downs and Mohegan Sun are surely for a winning streak in Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission unanimously approved a waiver to the standing deadline for operators to register applications including certified referendum results from their host communities by the end of the year.

More Time, The Following Year

That December 31 deadline ended up being likely to be a real issue with the Suffolk Downs casino proposal. While the gaming commission had been willing to permit the battle track and partner Mohegan Sun the possibility to build a casino solely on land into the town of Revere, it also agreed that the original vote taken early in the day this present year was for the significantly various proposal. As such, a new vote was needed one which would not have the ability to be held prior to the year-end deadline.

The decision was one which the panel said they made within an attempt become since fair as possible to all sides. On November 5, both East Boston and Revere voted on whether or not to approve a Suffolk Downs casino that would have been primarily and nearly entirely located on the Boston side of the edge involving the two communities. East Boston residents voted against that proposition, while Revere voters overwhelmingly approved it.

That left a whole lot of outstanding questions that are legal the most crucial of that has been whether Suffolk Downs could now create a casino solely on land in Revere, which had approved a casino. The decisions ever since then have essentially stated that the clear answer is ‘yes’ but that it’ll be treated being a unique project that have winner online casino bonus code to be re-approved, separately from the proposal that is previous.

‘We have wrestled hard with trying to puzzle out how to reconcile the ‘no’ vote in East Boston because of the ‘yes’ vote in Revere, and there’s no perfect solution,’ said Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby.

The waiver was the closest to that ‘perfect solution’ that the commission could show up with, thinking about the tight deadline. Mohegan Sun must still file their application being a prospective operator by the finish of 2013, but a 2nd referendum in Revere will simply take destination sometime in the next ninety days after the original deadline.

Boston Fires Back

Boston officials opposed the waiver, saying that the vote in East Boston should be ‘respected and maintained’ in a letter to the commission. In addition, incoming Boston Mayor-elect Martin Walsh has said that he’s gotn’t yet ruled out the possibility of taking action that is legal this second casino proposition in Revere.

But Revere Mayor Dan Rizzo has expressed confidence that the residents of his town will not only get to vote on the casino that is new, but that they’ll back it aided by the same sort of support they did the initial time around. On 5, 61 percent of Revere voters agreed to endorse the Suffolk Downs casino proposal, though it’s not clear if that support will increase or fall now that the casino will actually be in Revere november.

Should the new proposal gain approval from voters and regulators, it will end up being the second project to compete for the one available eastern Massachusetts casino license. The other casino proposal for the reason that region is situated in Everett, and would be operated by Wynn Resorts. That project just passed the suitability quotient associated with gaming payment’s investigations.

Polish Computer Programmers Sentenced for Cyber Blackmail Threats

They might look happy and carefree here, but Polish computer coders Patryk Surmacki, 35 (left) and Piotr Smirnow, 31 (right) meant no good if they authorized attacks that are cyber two casino sites (Image: Cavendish Press)

Two computer that is polish who attempted to blackmail two major unnamed online casino sites one in the united kingdom plus one in the usa have now been sentenced to jail, after a police sting nabbed the pair earlier this year.

False Pretenses

Piotr Smirnow, 31, and Patryk Surmacki, 35, approached who owns the UK web site and requested a gathering. The victim who owns A internet that is manchester-based casino met the pair underneath the knowing that Smirnow had a business proposition for him. He’d known the pair for four years ahead of the proposed company meeting, according to authorities reports.

But things took an unsightly change when, during the meeting which took destination at Heathrow Airport’s Terminal 5 the computer programmers demanded a 50 percent share for the man’s business and threatened to take the casino site down’s servers if he declined.

The set told the master that they knew a notorious computer hacker by the name of ‘Wapo’ into the U.S., whom they claimed would carry out the cyber-attack on the business’s servers if the pair paid him to do so, thereby stopping the operations of the company.

Known as being a ‘distributed denial of service’ (DDoS), the court was told that the attack is capable of decreasing also the many advanced of websites by overwhelming them through a mass attack of the business’s computer servers.

Cyber Hacker Paid

As the business owner refused to hand over 50 percent of his company, Smirnow and Surmacki carried out their threat on August 2nd and paid the cloaked American hacker £12,000 ($19,700) doing their dirty work. The Manchester-based site went straight down for five hours, costing the business enterprise £15,000 ($24,558) when no customers could access your website during that time.

The victim had already alerted Manchester police to the duo’s threat, nonetheless, and another meeting was set up in a hotel that is bugged close to Heathrow Airport on August 7th.

When the dog owner of the business told the pair that he would not cooperate with them, they told him they were ‘going to war’ and were then arrested by police who were on standby.

Smirnow additionally admitted that he had carried out an identical attack on an American victim through a Skype call, during which he stated that they had ‘enough power so people can’t take to to push us around anymore,’ leading Detective Inspector Mossop to the understanding that the investigation had taken down an ’emerging global cyber threat.’ This time the victim had been a U.S.-based gaming platform that enables 100 casino sites worldwide.

As for the U.S. site owners, they obviously dodged a bullet.

‘This case made me worry for my personal security, since well as money for hard times of my company. Which is why I felt compelled to take action against the perpetrators,’ stated who owns the casino that is manchester-based, which is predicted become well worth £30 million ($49,143,000). It’s calculated that a week-long assault on this business could have cost the site owner a $600,000 loss, based on court reports.

‘No one should have to succumb to blackmail and this sentence should act as a warning to those involved with cyber extortion that the authorities and the courts will view this kind of conduct very really,’ the web site owner added.

Smirnow and Surmacki later pleaded responsible to two charges of blackmail and acts that are unauthorized computers, and were sentenced to five years and four months each by Judge Michael Henshaw at the Manchester court. Their own defense team described their attempted blackmail as ‘bizarre, misconceived, naïve and brazen.’

‘They used their intimate, expert knowledge of online business to bully the victims into submission,’ revealed Detective Inspector Chris Mossop of the Serious Organised Crime Division. ‘ But make no mistake, they may were making use of the newest technology, but this ended up being simply good antique blackmail.’

Affinity Gaming Hit with Target-Style Security Breach

Nevada and casino that is regional Affinity Gaming is struck having a credit and debit card protection breach.

It’s not been a good week for the industry that supposedly safeguards our credit and debit card transactions. Just days after a nationwide scandal that pulled into the Secret Service to investigate a huge system hack at popular retailer Target a breach that could bring about fake charges, identity theft, or worse Las Vegas-based casino company Affinity Gaming appears to have been hit having a fiasco that is similar.

Credit-Processing Systems Compromised

Affinity announced that their credit and debit-processing systems had been hacked by the week-end’s begin, and were telling their customers most likely close to 300,000 of who could have been hit by the hacking to watch their credit info as well as any unauthorized charges to their accounts.

Precisely what everyone wants to worry about after blowing their holiday bankroll, right?

But wait, it gets worse. All the way through to October 16: that’s seven months while Target’s breach spanned approximately five weeks from around Thanksgiving to a week before Christmas Affinity says theirs hit all 12 of their properties in four U.S. states, and that the breach continued unabated from March 14 of this year. Contained in the properties affected were the business’s popular Nevada stateline gambling enterprises, including Whiskey Pete’s, Buffalo Bill’s, and Primm Valley Resort and Casino.

According to outside legal counsel for Affinity, James Prendergast, the cyber-hack ended up being from a ‘very sophisticated piece of malware that got into a location that is terrible. It got included and eradicated and we called in third-party forensic investigators for confirmation it was gone,’ Prendergast noted.

No chance to Know Who Got Hit

Adding to the confusion, because Affinity doesn’t store any customer bank card information in their databases, they have no means of knowing or notifying who might have been afflicted with the web theft. But with casinos scattered throughout Nevada, Colorado, Missouri and Iowa, it most probably could affect a nearly nationwide consumer base, particularly as several gambling enterprises have been in or near Las Vegas.

And if you occurred to pump gas at Affinity’s Primm Center petrol facility a significant stopping point at Nevada’s stateline into California you might maintain trouble, because that company’s credit and debit processing systems were also hacked, starting on an as-yet-undetermined date and ending on November 29.

So far, the only method Affinity has been able to notify customers of any possible issues was on their very own internet site with a ‘public notice of information safety event,’ but needless to say, many who may have been hit will never see that.

Both of whom have been notified, it definitely gets the attention of state regulatory agencies, including Nevada’s Gaming Control Board while hacking of this scope can fall under the purview of the Secret Service and the FBI. GCB Chairman A.G. Burnett says his company let the Nevada Gaming Commission know of the dilemmas immediately.

‘The business promptly notified us of what happened,’ Burnett explained. ‘They are working with us closely.’

This incident may cause and has now established a confidential, toll-free inquiry line to assist its customers. as for Affinity, aside from their internet site notice and media attention, they don’t have plenty of means to allow customers know what’s occurred or exactly what to complete about any of it, however in a statement said that ‘Affinity regrets any inconvenience’

That line, in the event that you think you could have already been affected, is open from 8 am to 6 pm Pacific Standard Time, Mondays through Fridays. The quantity to phone for U.S. or Canadian residents is 877-238-2179; all the international residents should phone Affinity at +1-814-201-3696.

‘Affinity is cooperating in the law that is ongoing investigation regarding the incident,’ an organization statement read. ‘Affinity has also taken lots of measures to strengthen the security of our community and contains caused legal and security vulnerability specialists to help identify and implement extra appropriate safeguards.’